On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:20:42 +0530 Sridhar wrote: SS> I thought of a solution for the missing coloums problem that I stated SS> earlier. Before I implement I need your comments on the same. SS> SS> I did some experiments with the 'netSnmpHostsTable' code that resides in SS> 'mibgroup/examples/' directory of Net-SNMP installation directory.
First off, not this this code uses a different style code. This new style handles sparse tables, while the style used by interfaces.c does not. SS> Please let me know your feedback on this change. I'm not sure what you are looking for, but I can say that your changes effectively emulate a sparse table. And setting NOSUCHINSTANCE is the right thing to do for a missing column in a sparse table. SS> Another question: Can anyway I can return a 'SNMP_NOSUCHINSTANCE' code SS> generated in ucd-snmp style ? No, I don't think so. The var routine for the old api returns a pointer. Any non-null value is interpreted as a value for the requested OID. As I said previously, if you want to handle sparse tables in old api routines, it would have to be done in the var routine. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-users> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users