Wes Hardaker wrote:
Yes, lame. I've found the code in Squid that responds to SNMP requests and,On Mon, 02 May 2005 13:12:47 -0700, John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
John> Apparently the BULK-GET received by snmpd is sent to Squid as John> a GET-NEXT with two OIDs. Ethereal reports this:
John> Version: 1 (0)
John> Community: public
John> PDU type: GET-NEXT (1)
John> Request Id: 0x60962325
John> Error Status: NO ERROR (0)
John> Error Index: 0
John> Object identifier 1: 1.3.6.1.4.1.3495.1.1.1 John> (SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3495.1.1.1)
John> Value: NULL
John> Object identifier 2: 1.3.6.1.4.1.3495.1.1.2 John> (SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3495.1.1.2)
John> Value: NULL
John> Squid responds with this:
John> Version: 1 (0)
John> Community: public
John> PDU type: RESPONSE (2)
John> Request Id: 0x60962325
John> Error Status: NO ERROR (0)
John> Error Index: 0
John> Object identifier 1: 1.3.6.1.4.1.3495.1.1.1.0 John> (SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3495.1.1.1.0)
John> Value: INTEGER: 84
John> It looks like the agent then segfaults when the snmpbulkget John> retries.
hmmm... lame that it's only returning one varbind when 2 were requested! not that anything should crash when this happens, mind you...
sure enough, if it's a GET it will loop through all the OIDs but if it's a GETNEXT
it just assumes a single OID. If I get the fix working I'll submit it the the Squid
folks.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
