Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not entire mib

[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Hi Dave, Thanks again for the response. I wasn't sure if I would I interpret the instructions right, so I just did more and here is what I tried. rCount is the scalar after the previous table and before the next table. 62 =>./snmpgetnext -v 2c -c P-public localhost MY-MIB::rCount MY-MIB::rCount.0 = INTEGER: 3 63 => 63 =>./snmpgetnext -v 2c -c P-public localhost MY-MIB::rCount.0 MY-MIB::rCount.0 = INTEGER: 0 64=> 64 =>./snmpbulkget -Cr1 -v 2c -c P-public localhost MY-MIB::rCount MY-MIB::rCount.0 = INTEGER: 3 65 => 65 =>./snmpbulkget -Cr1 -v 2c -c P-public localhost MY-MIB::rCount.0 MY-MIB::rCount.0 = INTEGER: 0 66 => 66 =>./snmpbulkget -Cr2 -v 2c -c P-public localhost MY-MIB::rCount MY-MIB::rCount.0 = INTEGER: 3 MY-MIB::boardId.0 = INTEGER: 0 67 => 67 =>./snmpbulkget -Cr2 -v 2c -c P-public localhost MY-MIB::rCount.0 MY-MIB::boardId.0 = INTEGER: 0 MY-MIB::boardId.1 = INTEGER: 1 I am thinking that I will spend a little time decreasing the size of my MIB and just have a small sample to see if this is reproducible with array-user without a lot of extras involved(I have varying scalar counts between tables, with about 10 tables). - John --- On Fri 06/03, Dave Shield < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: From: Dave Shield [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 09:36:10 +0100 Subject: Re: array-user snmpbulkwalk worked for a table not entire mib On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 15:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If I put the non-repeater value to anything 1 and higher it works
> fine.

If you're running 'snmpbulkwalk', then presumably you're only
supplying a single OID to work with?

In which case, setting a non-repeater value of 1 (or more),
means that you're not actually using the bulk retrieval aspect
of the GetBulk request. If you're querying for a single OID,
and saying "don't repeat this OID", then that's equivalent
to a straight GetNext-based walk.



> Then to get the entire table with a snmpbulkget I set -Cr to that
> number(33). It worked fine, no "no more variables". When I increased
> the number to 34, again it works fine, got a scalar object that is in
> the next object group as well. But, when I increased it to 35, that is
> when I saw the "no more variables".

Hmmm...
What happens if you run a single "snmpgetnext" request on the
scalar instance OID ?
What about a "snmpbulkget -Cr 1 " on the scalar instance OID?
What about a "snmpbulkget -Cr 2 " on the scalar *object* OID?

Dave

---

Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!