[Just replying for the sake of the mail archives.]

Quoting Turbo Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> There's a strange bug somewhere...
>
> ----- s n i p -----
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# table OID_BASE.6
> SNMP table: enterprises.bayourCom.snmp.baculaStats.baculaClientsTable
>
>  baculaClientsIndex     baculaClientName                  baculaClientUname 
> baculaClientAutoPrune baculaClientRetentionFile baculaClientRetentionJob
>                   1                    ?                                  ?   
>                   ?                         ?                        ?
>                   2              client2 sparc-unknown-linux-gnu,debian,3.0   
>                true                   1209600                  2592000
>                   3              client3       i386-pc-linux-gnu,debian,3.0   
>                true                   1209600                  2592000
>                   4              client4 sparc-unknown-linux-gnu,debian,3.0   
>                true                   1209600                  2592000
> ----- s n i p -----

Oki, THAT was: a) a bug in my script and b) a misunderstanding on how 
'snmptable'
retrieved it's values..

It tries to getnext on '<OID_BASE>.8.1.1' (and there I returned the correct
'<OID_BASE>.8.1.1.1'. But next query was for '<OID_BASE>.8.1.2' (and then
'<OID_BASE>.8.1.3' etc). But I STILL only returned '<OID_BASE>.8.1.1.1'. I
SHOULD have returned '<OID_BASE>.8.1.2.1' etc...


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to