On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 19:11 +0200, Makavy, Erez (Erez) wrote: > 1) find out if there is already a C++ API?
Not with this package, no. > 2) Use the OLD-API I would strongly recommend *against* doing anything based on the old API. All the development effort is now being concentrated on the new handler-based mechanism. > C) Any better Ideas? My honest advice would actually be to consider using a different SNMP toolkit. One designed with classes in mind right from the start is likely to prove much cleaner than trying to shoehorn a C++ API on top of the C-based Net-SNMP toolkit. My personal preference would be for SNMP++/Agent++, but that's because it's C++ toolkit that I'm most familiar with. There may be others out there that are worth considering too. But I'd also suggest that you look for something that support AgentX. This would allow you to link your (C++) subagent with the main Net-SNMP master agent (or any other AgentX master agent). The other developers may well disagree with this suggestion, but that's my advice! Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
