On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 17:40 +0100, Rodolfo Zitellini - Araknos Srl wrote: > Wow, thanks, now all works fine. I didn't figure that the group > usm wanted a user name
Well, strictly speaking "group usm" does want a security name, but there's (typically) a direct mapping between usernames and security names. > and not a com2sec security name... "com2sec" means "community (string) to security (name)". As such, it's only concerned with community-based SNMP. I.e. versions 1 and 2c. com2sec is completely irrelevant to SNMPv3. It's becoming increasingly clear to me that we need to overhaul the example config file, to make this more understandable. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
