On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 03:06 -0800, vijendra agarwal wrote: > Can you please let me know if there is any plan to implement getbulk > of agentx protocol in near future?
There's no explicit timetable for implementing this functionality, no. It is listed in the Feature Requests tracker (#1379500), but that's no guarantee as to how soon anyone will actually tackle the job. It'll probably depend on someone who needs to make use of this feature being prepared/able to do the work (or to fund someone else to do it!) > I know around 20% of code flow and data structure used by net-snmp. > I have good knowledge about C. so can you tell me, how much time > approx will it take if I try to implement it? I really couldn't suggest a meaningful estimate. It might be a two-minute job, since most of the bits are in place. The agent *does* support the AgentX GetBulk protocol request - it simply doesn't try to use it. So tweaking the register_agentx routine to include HANDLER_CAN_GETBULK *might* be sufficient (except that it seems to already do this). But much of this code probably hasn't been tested, and there are a lot of subtle problems in GetBulk handling. So getting it to work reliably might be a long hard slog. I really don't know. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
