>>>>> On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:40:22 +0100, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> said:
>> 2) there is no assurance that the keychange SET itself will fail if >> it is messed up or fails for some reason and every SET after it >> would fail because it would be using the newer key. Thomas> Can you elaborate on this, please? Are you saying that there Thomas> are circumstances under which the RESPONSE to the SET would Thomas> indicate an error status 0 (zero, no error) even though the Thomas> key hasn't been changed? I'm probably misreading this, so Thomas> please clarify. No, I'm saying that the error status may indeed *not* be 0 because something in the SET failed and the agent didn't accept any of the varbinds, even the keychange if it would have succeeded otherwise. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
