>>>>> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:27:17 +0300, "Makavy, Erez (Erez)" <[EMAIL >>>>> PROTECTED]> said:
Erez> My solution - is it safe? Erez> --------------------------------- Erez> Within the access_method of my (agentx) sub-agent, within the mode Erez> MODE_GET, I basically invoke these net-snmp API function: Erez> [in this order] Erez> - snmp_sess_init(&session); Erez> - ss = snmp_open(&session); Erez> - pdu = snmp_pdu_create(i_queryType); Erez> - snmp_synch_response(ss, pdu, &response); Erez> - snmp_free_pdu(response); Erez> - snmp_close(ss); Erez> It seems to work, but I'm not sure it safe, with all the global Erez> variables net-snmp is using to manage sessions, parse PDUs, and Erez> much more I don't know of... Erez> Is it safe? I'm certainly not going to promise it's safe, but in theory it might be. However, you should be using a asynchronous request instead of a synchronous one... See the ucd-snmp/proxy.c file for an example of how a asynchronous request is used to send a request, return control to the master agent, receive the response and finish up the handling of the original request. Right now, if you use snmp_synch_response you'll potentially end up dropping other important packets... -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
