I just said tha the explaination of the mask is not clear and the padding that you add at the end (the five bit set to 0) to make the thing work is not obvious. It's why my not working mask is the same than you but without the padding.
Thanks, Dominique --- Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 24/08/06, Dominique bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Q: I'm not sure where you got the: > > > > A: It's one of the syntax that I try. Is the same > than > > you but without the padding at the end it's why I > try > > 0x3:0xFD where the second bit is set to zero. > > Errr... no. > I suggested 0xffa0 which equates to 1111 1111 1010 > 0000 > Your mask of 0x3:0xFD would presumably expand to > 0000 0011 1111 1101 > which is something completely different. > (unless I've completely misunderstood something > here). > > Dave > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
