On 07/10/06, santhosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have got the 3 tables now as a part of a node in MIB tree > so I want to provide the same tables for four different interfaces > I mean that previoulsy the 3 tables were giving me the information of single > interface > now my system has four interfaces of same kind > > So rather than creating 12 Tables I tought to make a table for Interface > first and place the three tables as part of Interface table
No - keep the same three tables, but add an extra object to the INDEX clause. So that the tables are now indexed by 'ifIndex' plus the previous indices. As far as the structure of the MIB is concerned, these are "completely separate" tables (so you don't have a table-under-a-table, which is invalid). But because there's a shared index object ifIndex), your tables can be merged with the standard ifTable, to mimic the effect of a set of tables-within-a-table. You do *not* need to define four separate copies of each table. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
