At 01:56 PM 3/2/2007, Thomas Anders wrote: >Rex Tener wrote: > > So, I used cvs to check out the HEAD of the net-snmp/dist > > directory. However, I couldn't find a tag for the version of the > > Makefile or net-snmp.spec file that was used to build 5.2.3. It > > appears these files have diverged quite a bit over the last seven > > months and would not be usable to build the 5.2.3 release from source. > >The dist/net-snmp.spec file has been added back for 5.2.4 which is >currently at >pre-release (5.2.4.pre2) level. Feel free to give it a try and >report back to us.
I pulled the [net-snmp]/v5-2-patches/net-snmp branch. I then pulled the Makefile from [net-snmp]/trunk/net-snmp/dist and dropped it in the dist directory of the 5.2 patch branch. I was able to build and install RPM's and then compile against them. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]# rpm --upgrade net-snmp-5.2.2-1.i386.rpm > > file /usr/bin/net-snmp-config from install of > > net-snmp-5.2.2-1 conflicts with file from package net-snmp-devel-5.1.2-11 > > file /usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so from install of net-snmp-5.2.2-1 > > conflicts with file from package net-snmp-devel-5.1.2-11 > >Fedora splits Net-SNMP into a different set of packages than we do which may >break "rpm -U". I'd suggest to "rpm -e" the Fedora-supplied packages first and >then "rpm -i" ours. I was able to get 5.2.2 RPM's distributed to my developers. Thanks, Rex Tener [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
