On 29/10/2007, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What do you mean by "stock ... MIBs"? > > I meant what you see in a full snmpwalk of a device
OK. > and I don't see > anything that looks like a duplex setting even from the Ciscos. Then I suspect you're out of luck. The agent can only report the information that it's been coded to handle. If it doesn't contain code to look for the duplex status of a device, then it can't report that information. You could try asking Cisco whether they suppport the EtherLike-MIB, but it wouldn't surprise me if they said no. > > And to forestall your next question - no, the Net-SNMP agent does not > > currently implement the Etherlike-MIB. > > If anyone wishes to take a stab at this, then feel free! > > It does seem to be one of the most common network problems where you > have one device forced to full duplex from back in the days when > negotiation didn't work very well and you've replaced the connected device. Oh, I agree. Adding support for the EtherLike-MIB would be well worth doing. If anyone wishes to volunteer to implement this, they would be welcomed with open arms, riches, fame and immortality (or some subset of these). The main problem with an Open Source project like Net-SNMP is that it is dependent on volunteer labour to do anything. So coding tends to get done by the person who actually wants that functionality the most. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
