it indeed has no need to set four similar directives that give the four
copies of every trap, i only want to try every directive to see whether they
could work normally, but to make me surprise that simple trapsess directive
gives me unexpected Segment defaut
在2008-05-06，"Dave Shield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道：
2008/5/5 ema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> trapsink 192.168.1.100 public
> trap2sink 192.168.1.100 public
> informsink 192.168.1.100 public
> trapsess 192.168.1.100
Do you really want to send *four* copies of every trap
to the same trap receiver?
Why????
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
