On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:50 +0100, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Julius wrote:
> >>> Connection from UDP: [127.0.0.1]->[127.0.0.1]:-5226 REFUSED
> >>> [...]
> > On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 18:23 +0100, Jan Houtsma wrote:
> >> Isn't that the same as the one i posted before ("Re: Fedora
> >> 10+x86_64+snmpd gives segfault in libc-2.9.so at startup")?
> >>
> >> The first symptom of snmpd not starting is that you get connection
> >> errors...... Are you on x86_64?
> >
> > Yes, its x86_64.
> > heres a strace output from snmpd starting up:
> > http://www.reactos.org/paste/index.php/2451/
> >
> > contains a lot lines like this:
> > close(344) = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
> >
> > how can i check if snmpd crashes on libc.so.x ?
> >
> > but i doubt that glibc/snmpd versions are a problem here, both were not
> > updated in my archlinux distribution after the first working
> > installation.
>
> A daemon that repeatedly logs
>
> Connection from UDP: [127.0.0.1]->[127.0.0.1]:-5226 REFUSED
>
> is obviously running, i.e. has *not* crashed. Please check your tcp-wrapper
> configuration, i.e. /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny.
>
>
> +Thomas
Thx, solved the problem.
Julius
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
