Thanks Dave. That's pretty much what I thought. > -----Original Message----- > From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com > [mailto:dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Dave Shield > Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 8:04 PM > To: Lewis Adam-VNQM87 > Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: syntax for fixed size tables within SNMP MIBS > > On 6 April 2010 17:22, Lewis Adam-VNQM87 <vnq...@motorola.com> wrote: > > 1. Is the error message correct if we want to support the > > latest SNMP standards? > > RowStatus is certainly the standard mechanism for controlling > the creation/deletion of rows in SNMP tables. > But I'm not sure I'd describe it as an _error_ for a table to > not have a RowStatus column. It's certainly worth a warning, > but it's not actually an error. > > > > 2. If we know a table has a fixed number of entries, is > there a syntax we > > can use to specify that rows cannot be created? > > Define the column objects as "read-only" or "read-write". > If the columns are not "read-create", then the validator > should not attempt to require a RowStatus column. > (And if it does, then it's broken IMO!) > > Dave >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
