Hi all,
I’m using net-snmp 5.4.2.1 to test ipAddressTable。
and use following command:
snmpgetnext -v 2C -c IPv6Ready udp6:3ffe:501:ffff:100:2E0:FFF:FE8E:7075 1.3.
6.1.2.1.4.34.1.3.2.63.254.5.1.255.255.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0
1.3.6.1.2.1.4.34.1.4.2.63.254.5.1.255.255.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0 1.3.6.1.2.1.4.
34.1.5.2.63.254.5.1.255.255.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0
1.3.6.1.2.1.4.34.1.6.2.63.254.5.1.255.255.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0
and result is as following:
IP-MIB::ipAddressIfIndex.ipv6.63.254.5.1.255.255.1.0.2.224.15.255.254.142.11
2.117 = INTEGER: 312
IP-MIB::ipAddressType.ipv6.63.254.5.1.255.255.1.0.2.224.15.255.254.142.112.1
17 = INTEGER: unicast(1)
IP-MIB::ipAddressPrefix.ipv6.63.254.5.1.255.255.1.0.2.224.15.255.254.142.112
.117 = OID: joint-iso-ccitt.0 # return the index in the
ipAddressPrefixTable,not real prefix
IP-MIB::ipAddressOrigin.ipv6.63.254.5.1.255.255.1.0.2.224.15.255.254.142.112
.117 = INTEGER: manual(2)
My questions is that the result of
IP-MIB::ipAddressPrefix.ipv6.63.254.5.1.255.255.1.0.2.224.15.255.254.142.112
.117 is right or wrong?
If the result of ipAddressPrefix is wrong, could you please tell me the
answer?
in rfc4293:
ipAddressPrefix OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowPointer
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A pointer to the row in the prefix table to which this
address belongs. May be { 0 0 } if there is no such row."
DEFVAL { zeroDotZero }
::= { ipAddressEntry 5 }
Any help appreciated
Daobiao Gong
BII
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
