>
> Just to clarify - does the command display anything from the SecondTable?
> Or is the output as expected?
>
nothing displaying from secondTable, it's good.
> If the output is correct, but your concern is that the agent receives a
> final
> request for the first entry in the SecondTable (which is then discarded),
> then that is perfectly normal. It's inherent in the way that walking an
> SNMP table works.
>
It can question for coders archive, but, if i made a line of tables by
mib2c.mfd.conf and make snmpwalk question to first table, all other tables
answers too, but it is not displayed in my query. So, how can I make that
Second Table didn't answer the getnext request if it is coming from table
before this table? Or is there way to find a solution for asking only one
table?
Best regards, Egor
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
