>> How the SNMP read(differentiate) the different indexes in the OID ?
In this particular case 3 of them of are of fixed length, so SNMP specs tell 
how to interpret the indexes. Ip address is in dotted format, so there will be 
3 dots for ip. In case variable length( e.g name), it needs to prepended with 
number of characters in the index. E.g
Index 1: name1 (varaiable length)
Index2:  new-name2 (varaiable length)

Now the index for any ROW for the table will be
5.ASCII(n).ASCII(a).ASCII(m).ASCII(e).ASCII(1).9. 
ASCII(n).ASCII(e).ASCII(w).ASCII(-).ASCII(n).ASCII(a).ASCII(m).ASCII(e).ASCII(2)

5 here is length of "name1" and 9 is length of "new-name2"

For fixed length string or IP Addresses, lndeth doesn't have to pre-pended


>> How net-snmp code find out this object having  4 indexes ?
To use net-snmp code needs to know the MIB, then only net-snmp can handle the 
request else it will respond back with "Unkown OID". Somebody has to compile 
MIB and fill the needed places to net-snmp to accept a OID


Is there any net-snmp function available(Or similar which I can modify and use) 
which will separate out the different Indexes
>> I am not sure of a function. I believe the generated code will have access 
>> to all the indexes. I believe it will be good if you try to compile a MIB, 
>> see the data-structures generated. On generation of code, there is structure 
>> generated for indexes also. Look for GENERATED_TABLE_mib_index.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to