Hi,

The problem is in the command  "snmpwalk –v1 –c ammeon 10.44.84.33
1.3.6.1.4.1.232". I have marked them in red.

It should be " snmpwalk  -v1 -c ammeon 10.44.84.33 1.3.6.1.4.1.232". Not
the Dashes before the version and community options.

Thanks
-anand



On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Daniel Sanabria <sanabri...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks for replying,
>
> I'm getting this when doing snmpwalk using the enterprise oid
>
> [root@admin ~]# snmpwalk –v1 –c ammeon 10.44.84.33 1.3.6.1.4.1.232
> –c: Unknown Object Identifier (Sub-id not found: (top) -> –c)
> [root@admin ~]#
>
> Where is the problem? is it in the target (blade enclosure) or the host
> from where I run the snmpwalk command?
>
>
> On 1 November 2011 20:52, Alexandre James <aja...@sandvine.com> wrote:
>
>>  I believe if you don’t pass an oid to snmp walk it will only want the
>> mib-2 tree (1.3.6.1.2) where the CPQRACK-MIB is an enterprise mib so it’s
>> under the enterprise tree (1.3.6.1.4.1). More specifically, if do something
>> link the following, you should only get the contents of the CPQRACK-MIB:*
>> ***
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> snmpwalk –v1 –c ammeon 10.44.84.33 1.3.6.1.4.1.232****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Daniel Sanabria [mailto:sanabri...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 01, 2011 11:00 AM
>> *To:* net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> *Subject:* problems while querying an HP blade enclosure****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Hi, ****
>>
>>
>> We're looking to look after our HP blade enclosure using net-snmp
>> utilities installed in one of our linux servers ( NET-SNMP version:  5.5,
>> RHEL 6.10). I've obtained the relevant  set of MIB files from a HP source
>> and I think I've exported/uploaded these correctly on the host from where
>> I'm  currently running my snmpget commands, but I'm getting the following
>> error when trying to get values from the Enclosure:
>>
>> [root@admin mibs]# snmpget -v1 -c ammeon 10.44.84.33
>> CPQRACK-MIB::cpqRackServerBladePowered
>> Error in packet
>> Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.
>> Failed object: CPQRACK-MIB::cpqRackServerBladePowered
>>
>> [root@admin mibs]# snmptranslate -TB 'cpqRackServerBladePowered'
>> CPQRACK-MIB::cpqRackServerBladePoweredOff
>> CPQRACK-MIB::cpqRackServerBladePoweredOn
>> CPQRACK-MIB::cpqRackServerBladePowered
>> [root@admin mibs]#
>>
>> An snmpwalk is reporting back a number of variables/counters but none
>> from CPQRACK-MIB:
>>
>> [root@admin mibs]# snmpwalk -v1 -c ammeon 10.44.84.33
>> SNMPv2-MIB::sysDescr.0 = STRING: HP Onboard Administrator
>> SNMPv2-MIB::sysObjectID.0 = OID: SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.11.5.7.1.2
>> DISMAN-EVENT-MIB::sysUpTimeInstance = Timeticks: (295131) 0:49:11.31
>> SNMPv2-MIB::sysContact.0 = STRING: Daniel Sanabria
>> SNMPv2-MIB::sysName.0 = STRING: atc7000-71oa1
>> SNMPv2-MIB::sysLocation.0 = STRING: Athlone Lab
>> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORLastChange.0 = Timeticks: (385) 0:00:03.85
>> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.1 = OID: SNMPv2-MIB::snmpMIB
>> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.2 = OID: TCP-MIB::tcpMIB
>> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.3 = OID: RFC1213-MIB::ip
>> SNMPv2-MIB::sysORID.4 = OID: UDP-MIB::udpMIB
>>
>> .
>> .
>> .
>>
>>
>>  Any ideas on what I might be doing wrong here ? :(
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Daniel****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RSA&#174; Conference 2012
> Save $700 by Nov 18
> Register now&#33;
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
> _______________________________________________
> Net-snmp-users mailing list
> Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA&#174; Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to