On 31 July 2012 09:46, Naama Bar Menachem <[email protected]> wrote: > I see what you mean. > What do you suggest? To insert the entry to local data structure in > "create_entry" or to remove the "SNMP_FREE" call?
No - you need to change *BOTH* of these routines to work with your kernel-based APIs. The 'createEntry' routine needs to set up a new entry in the kernel table, and the 'deleteEntry' needs to remove it. > I lean towards the second, if it is possible and will not cause memory > issues, since I still don't see how the already exists rows are inserted > into local data structure as well. If you are not using a local data structure, then you don't need to create new rows in it. But you *DO* need to create new rows in the data structure that you *are* using - i.e. the kernel table. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list [email protected] Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
