On Jul 14, 2015, at 4:29 PM, Bill Fenner wrote:
> Why is it correct to convert the input to unsigned, and then back to signed,
> in the integer64 case? Shouldn't we use strtoll instead of strtoull for the
> signed version?
No idea. I didn't write the original code or patch :). I have no idea
what's going on at the rest of the code (never really bothered looking :),
I just tried to 'fix' the problem in as simple and non-desruptive way I
could, extending on the patch you gave me (which I saw as partly
wrong and partly missing)…
You have raised a couple of issues, that makes sense, on my patch
but (re)writing it in a way that's perfect and works with the rest of the
code, I leave to someone with more knowledge of the software..
--
You know, boys, a nuclear reactor is a lot like a woman.
You just have to read the manual and press the right buttons
- Homer Simpson
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
