Hello,
Get yourself netatalk1.4 in rpm format and install it directly with the rpm
utility... much easier. I tried to compile 1.3.3 long time ago... I
succeeded, but I had to hack the sources quite a bit.
I can remember of some changes: just forget about bytesex.h: delete all
#include<bytesex.h>. After that, you will get many errors which make
reference to signal. I'm sorry I can not remember exactly what happened, but
I think that the problem was an erroneus assignment of an integer to a
signal structure. There is a macro in signal.h (referenced in Stevens,
Advanced programming in the Unix Environment) which you can use to
initialize the signal masks... sorry y can not remember exactly now... hacks
work this way: you use them and then forget them; specially if you end up
finding an "rpm" file someway.
�Where to find it? in RedHat.com, in "contrib". It's called
netatalk1.4b2+asun2.1.1 (more or less).
Once installed, it works quite fine.
Christian
----- Original Message -----
From: Nicole Lallande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 12:33 AM
Subject: [netatalk-admins] Re: missing file at make
> am trying to compile netatalk - (RH Linux 6.0 using netatalk-1.3.3) and
> there seem to be an include file missing - endian.h looks for bytesex.h -
> and the file does not exist. Have searched other directories - no joy.
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> Nicole
>
>
> ***********************************
> Nicole Lallande
> VOX: 760.753.6766
> FAX: 760.753.6768
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ______________________________ "Advice to worms: Sleep late"
> www.mipana.com
> www.high-techmarketing.com
> ***********************************
>
>
