Hello,
On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 12:29:24PM +0100, Stefan Barth wrote:
> Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>
> > Anybody willing to
> > take a look at the "damaged" QX document?
>
> Yes. Stuff it and send it.
It's attached. One stuffed and one unstuffed.
> This does happen, with netatalk and without.
> I keep preaching to use both backup mechanisms in Quark, and save to
> different volumes, different physical disks if possible.
Both backup mechanisms? Sorry, I'm not very versatile about Quark---
what would you suggest? There were some reports about Autosave feature
making troubles. However, having autobackup would be nice, i.e.
renaming the previous copy of a document under different name.
Versioning would be the best, but I don't think we'll find it here.
> Quark is not perfect either, and it costs a shitload of money.
Yes, so I've heard. Well, this seems to be expensive business in terms
of software.
>
> Stefan
Many thanks.
Dejan
--
Dejan Muhamedagic mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
UNIX and Linux Support mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quant-X Service & Consulting Ges.m.b.H. http://www.quant-x.com
Phn: +43 4212 90555-0 Fax: 90555-20 Free: +800 90555 000
