on 3/15/00 3:50 PM, Patrik Schindler at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, because they serve two absolutely different needs and even more different
> platforms.
I think what he was mumbling about is that it would be nice to have a
configuration tool, similar to SAMBA's web-based tool, for netatalk - or one
that integrates the two together.
So far, the only tool I know that would be moderately easy to write for
would be Linuxconf, mostly because it is very flexible. Due to netatalk's
simple config files, this ought to be relatively easy (albeit still beyond
my abilities).
I for one do agree that a good configuration tool, web-based, would be a
boon.
Harry
