At 9:55 Uhr +0200 19.05.2000, Michael Paesold wrote: >Correct me if I'm wrong, but that would change the default action of any >program, which would be a problem. You're right. >With common ftp servers there is an >option "-u umask", that would be great for netatalk, too. UNfortunately there isn't such an option yet (AFAIK). >For now I prefer the setgid solution. This won't carry the g+w bit, anyway. :wq! PoC
- umode/mask for newly created files... Michael Paesold
- Re: umode/mask for newly created files... Lancaster, David Matthew
- Re: umode/mask for newly created files... Patrik Schindler
- Re: umode/mask for newly created files..... Michael Paesold
- Re: umode/mask for newly created fil... Patrik Schindler
- Re: umode/mask for newly created files..... Lancaster, David Matthew
- Re: umode/mask for newly created fil... Patrik Schindler
