At 18:00 Uhr -0400 31.05.2000, Scott R. Every wrote: >so no version of the 2.1.4 series will work? 2.1.4 works for me and many others very fine. >why was this done? Usually, encrypted passwords will improve security. So it was done. I had problems because I don't use PAM and had to apply the separate -lcrypt to the Makefile and something in the source to get it working. :wq! PoC
- netatalk will not accept password with 1.4b2+asun2.1.4 S.Ecker
- Re: netatalk will not accept password with 1.4b2+asu... Scott R. Every
- Re: netatalk will not accept password with 1.4b2... Patrik Schindler
- Re: netatalk will not accept password with 1... Scott R. Every
- Re: netatalk will not accept password wi... Patrik Schindler
- Re: netatalk will not accept passwo... Scott R. Every
- Re: netatalk will not accept pa... Patrik Schindler
- Re: netatalk will not accep... Scott R. Every
- Re: netatalk will not accep... Scott R. Every
- Re: netatalk will not accep... Patrik Schindler
- Re: netatalk will not accept password wi... Tim Carlson
- RE: netatalk will not accept password with 1.4b2+asu... Hirokazu Nomoto
- RE: netatalk will not accept password with 1.4b2+asu... Luke McNeilage
