Re: Routing Table in netatalk?

[Hong F Du]

Yes, you are right. 0192:01 on eth1 and 1964:95 on eth0 are assigned to this machine as router. According to my atalk.conf eth0 -phase 2 -net 6500 -addr 6500.149 -zone "sci".... and there is no any number as 0192 and 1964 in it. Why didn't I see any 6500 network number shows up on the /proc/net/atalk_route? Is there any relationship between 6500 in atalk.conf and 1964 on /proc/net/atalk_route? feng andrew morgan wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Hong F Du wrote: > > > Thank you. That is great. How do I interpret the output of > > #cat /proc/net/atalk_route > > Target Router Flages Dev > > 0192:01 0000:00 5 lo > > 4F23:00 1964:9F 3 eth0 > > 0192:00 0192:01 1 eth1 > > 1964:95 0000:00 5 lo > > 1964:00 1964:95 1 eth0 > > 0000:00 0000:00 5 lo > > > > Is Target for network number? How many routers are there totally? Are there > > two routers on eth0, which one is my? Is Flages for hop count? > > If I'm understanding it correctly, "Target" is the target network number, > and the "Router" field next to it is the gateway machine to get to that > network. I don't think Flags is the hop count, but I don't know what it > means either. > > Let me break down your information by interface: > > 4F23:00 1964:9F 3 eth0 > 1964:00 1964:95 1 eth0 > > 0192:00 0192:01 1 eth1 > > 0192:01 0000:00 5 lo > 1964:95 0000:00 5 lo > 0000:00 0000:00 5 lo > > If we look at this, you have 2 routers on eth0 and 1 router on eth1. > However, 1 of those on each interface may be this machine. Have a look in > /proc/net/atalk_iface to see what address is assigned to this machine. > > Andy