Human Nature: Justice versus Power.
Noam Chomsky debates with Michel Foucault - 1971.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the third debate of the International
Philosophers' Project. Tonight's debaters are Mr. Michel Foucault, of
the College de France, and Mr. Noam Chomsky, of the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology. Both philosophers have points in common and
points of difference. Perhaps the best way to compare both philosophers
would be to see them as tunnellers through a mountain working at
opposite sides of the same mountain with different tools, without even
knowing if they are working in each other's direction.
But both are doing their jobs with quite new ideas, digging as
profoundly as possible with an equal commitment in philosophy as in
politics: enough reasons, it seems to me for us to expect a fascinating
debate about philosophy and about politics.
I intend, therefore, not to lose any time and to start off with a
central, perennial question: the question of human nature.
All studies of man, from history to linguistics and psychology, are
faced with the question of whether, in the last instance, we are the
product of all kinds of external factors, or if, in spite of our
differences, we have something we could call a common human nature, by
which we can recognise each other as human beings.
So my first question is to you Mr. Chomsky, because you often employ
the concept of human nature, in which connection you even use terms like
"innate ideas" and "innate structures". Which arguments can you derive
from linguistics to give such a central position to this concept of
human nature?
enjoy...
http://www.chomsky.info/debates/1971xxxx.htm
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
