... THERE'S NO ANSWER WITHOUT QUESTION ... THERE'S NO ''FREEDOM'' WITHOUT OPOSITE OF FREEDOM ... IF YOU HAVE ANSWER, WE HOPE IT'S FREE TO TELL US ... IF YOU DO THAT - NOBEL PRICE'S FOR YOUR RESEARCH TEAM IS ON HORIZON ... MANIK ... FEBRUARY ... 2013 ... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bjørn Magnhildøen" <noem...@gmail.com> To: "manik" <ma...@sbb.rs>; "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity" <netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 11:48 AM Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] ''NON - FREE''
> what if freedom is a death drive - do you go for it or not? > and you better not be bound by your answer, nor the question > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:28 AM, manik <ma...@sbb.rs> wrote: >> ... MANIK DON'T THINK THAT ROB WANT ONLY HIS PERSONAL FREEDOM ... BUT >> WHAT >> IF *WE* NEUTRALIZE CORPORATE PEOPLE TO TAKE OUR FREEDOM, WE MAKE THEM NOT >> FREE ( TO DO WHAT THEY USE TO DO )?... IS ''NON - FREE'' STATE IMMANENT >> TO >> HUMAN RACE? ... MANIK ... FEBRUARY ... 2013 ... >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NetBehaviour mailing list >> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org >> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
