I would ask "How is it an improvement? " but I've only just got up and need to stay awake.
On 18 December 2013 01:09, Pall Thayer <[email protected]> wrote: > I would agree with Rob that it is an improvement on the original *after the > fact*. But I wouldn't call it a "great" improvement. I don't think that > seeing it out of the context of your statement would invoke the original. > Sorry, just being honest. > > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:22 PM, [email protected] > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> ? >> >> Il 18/12/13 01.19, Rob Myers ha scritto: >> > On 17/12/13 01:23 PM, Michael Szpakowski wrote: >> >> >> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/szpako/11384244484/ >> > >> > A great improvement on the original. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > NetBehaviour mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> NetBehaviour mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > > > > -- > ***************************** > Pall Thayer > artist > http://pallthayer.dyndns.org > ***************************** > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
