I meant my comment was non-serious.
On Sat, 3 May 2014 09:52:32 +0100 "michael gurstein" <gurst...@gmail.com> wrote: > James, > > I'm not sure why you think this is non-serious... > > Sounds like a YesMen culture jam and a very very good one. > > http://theyesmen.org/ > > M > > -----Original Message----- > From: netbehaviour-boun...@netbehaviour.org > [mailto:netbehaviour-boun...@netbehaviour.org] On Behalf Of James > Morris Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2014 9:35 AM > To: netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org > Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Links - some non-serious comments > > > > > > > "What a Toilet Hoax Can Tell Us About the Future of Surveillance" - > > > > http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/04/what-a-toilet-ho > > ax-can-tell-us-about-the-future-of-surveillance/361408/ > > I can tell their data is flawed at a glance, too many "deposits" had > neutral odors, and none smelled of roses. > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
