Hi Randall That's a really nice idea - museums dedicated to net art. Closest we get to this is websites and blogs featuring work I suppose. Or virtual galleries as in second life. Wonder how such a thing would look/ what form it would take?
On 19 May 2015 at 15:46, Randall Packer <rpac...@zakros.com> wrote: > Curt, my response would be for net artists to build their own guggenheims > of monumentality that can only be served by the network. I don¹t think the > networked aspirations begun in the 1990s have yet to be completed! > > On 5/14/15, 12:27 AM, "c...@lab404.com" <c...@lab404.com> wrote: > > >Thanks Randall, > > > >I have a (pipe) dream that before I die I will get a playdamage show at > >the guggenheim, with 100+ monitors and directional speakers going all the > >way up, one for each playdamage. > > > >During the show in the atrium I will do an on-site residency for a month > >where I am there all day long making 1 playdamage per day, and each day > >the new one gets added to the wall and the web site. > > > >Since that¹s not going to happen, maybe it will have to happen in a less > >rarified space with fewer hardware requirements. Or the usual way >> at > >my house + online. > > > >////// > > > >There is a thing that started in chicago called ³no media² which is like > >improvisational audio/video live performance, but without any software or > >settings prepared. So you build your performance on the fly. Also > >related, I like this show ( > > > http://archive.renaissancesociety.org/site/Exhibitions/Images.Joelle-Tuerl > >inckx-Chicago-Studies-Les-etants-donnes.56.html ) where she just makes > >her installations from materials available in the museum offices. So I > >like the idea of a site-specific process constraint where you wouldn¹t > >use any source material from the internet or come with any source > >material prepared on your hard drive; all your a/v source materials would > >have to be captured from your physical production space, or generated on > >your machine, and then of course further modulated in the machine, to > >ultimately arrive on the wall/network. > > > >////// > > > >The video source for the two playdamages below is cell phone video of our > >upstairs bathroom wall with shadows through the window of distant > >bradford pear trees blowing in the wind at dusk. And both audios are from > >the same Yes song. > > > >Best from Asheville, > >Curt > > > > > > > >On May 13, 2015, at 8:29 AM, Randall Packer <rpac...@zakros.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Curt, I love your playdamage works. Keep them coming, do one a day, > >>no > >> damage control here! > >> > >> All best, > >> > >> Randall > >> > >> On 5/13/15, 12:34 PM, "c...@lab404.com" <c...@lab404.com> wrote: > >> > >>> http://playdamage.org/109.html > >>> http://playdamage.org/108.html > >>> > >>> love, > >>> curt > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> NetBehaviour mailing list > >>> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org > >>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > >> > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour >
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour