Looks like a very interesting idea, profit-sharing social networks. The documentation suggest that it may be structured like a ponzi scheme, which is not entirely bad.
Compensation structures like that heavily favor early adopters and people that significantly grow the network. Most business in technology favors early adopters of anything successful. The problem for a social network is the social cost of creating a community that heavily favors growth. From a Media Ecology standpoint, the social network's content inevitably becomes about growth, diluting other ways people might use the platform. On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:46 PM, James Morris <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyone using it? > > "tsū is a free social network and payment platform that shares up to 90% > of [advertising] revenues with its users." > > http://www.tsu.co/faq > > Here's an important notification at the head of their FAQ: > "tsu.co is a community for authentic engagement. Please treat it > respectfully. Users who spam or post inappropriate content will be banned > in order to preserve the community." > > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour -- ________________________________________________________________ ================================================================ =--------------------------------------------------------=-===-=-=-====-- +_+~_=_~--+__+=-^=-+_+_=^-+__+-=+_+~__=__~-_-____-=++=_--^-===-=-==-=-=-- =--------------------------------------------------------=-===-=-=-====-- http://bishopZ.com _______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
