thank you as well!

On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, BishopZ wrote:

excellent. very nice.
your sense of depth is a marvel.

thank you again.

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Alan Sondheim <sondh...@panix.com> wrote:


      On Universal Attributes {UA}

      http://www.alansondheim.org/nord3.jpg
      http://www.alansondheim.org/nord.mp4
      http://www.alansondheim.org/nord1.jpg
      http://www.alansondheim.org/nord2.jpg

      ON = our neighborhood universe, by projection, on top of, on the
      bottom of, our universe.

      NON = not our universe; therefore either

      N = nowhere if no multiverse or

      NON = elsewhere, within one or more universe in a populated
      multiverse

      ANON = elsewhere, within a designated but unknown universe in a
      populated multiverse, ANON as in "a not our neighborhood
      universe"

      V{ANON,ON} = the set of characteristics of all multiverse
      universes including our own, which may be written V{(AN,1)ON}
      which neatly simultaneously emphasizes our home base ("1") as
      well as V, "all" and note that

      V and ANON are slippages which may be restrained by relays
      within AN

      This is at best a game which depends on the useless
      clarification of language: nothing lost, and nothing gained. It
      is a sloppy game: N = "not" but also "neighborhood" and A =
      "all" but also resonates with the poetics of anonymity which
      excludes ON, but recuperates it, to the extent that our universe
      - "The Local" - itself is perhaps minimally accessible and
      infinitely unaccessible. Rather than continuums (Peirce or
      other) we might refer to _percolations_ of accessibilities and
      inaccessibilities. In the meantime, there is _no way whatsoever_
      to grasp the immensity (ON) and immensities (ANON) at stake,
      except by virtue of a poetics of extrapolation and
      inaccessibility, as if the granularity of percolation were
      fundamentally irreducible. We are swallowed whole by these
      considerations, and the languaging, which may appear to possess
      sense of one or another form, turns out to be nothing more than
      a _cipher_ that is discernible only by name (ANON, etc.), and
      not at all, whatsoever, by content or reference. All of this
      might be rewritten

      ^ = {[0-9, A-Z]} =

      in some regular expression, the bracketed terms replaceable by
      anything whatsoever, and the equivalence or substitution in the
      third position, emptied of all content.

      -------------------

      [I contribute nothing to thought.
      [My thinking is the thought of nothing. [An old post-modern ploy
      contributing nothing.
      [A digital ploy of insertion and (in)accessibility.
      [Ignorant depths.
      ]

      ------------------
       ~~

      _______________________________________________
      NetBehaviour mailing list
      NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
      http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour




--
________________________________________________________________
================================================================
=--------------------------------------------------------=-===-=-=-====--
+_+~_=_~--+__+=-^=-+_+_=^-+__+-=+_+~__=__~-_-____-=++=_--^-===-=-==-=-=--
=--------------------------------------------------------=-===-=-=-====--

http://bishopZ.com
_______________________________________________________________________



==
email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/tv.txt
==
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to