it's a bit tangential, but in 2007 stephen schrumm presented a proposed taxonomy of digital performance. i wrote a bit about it in my masters thesis:
At the 2007 Association for Theatre in Higher Education (ATHE) conference in New Orleans, Stephen Schrum presented a “Proposed Taxonomy of Digital Performance” (Schrum, 2007). Prompted by the absence of such a thing, he offered his taxonomy as a starting point for a discussion around common terms within the field of digital performance that might be agreed on and adopted. His taxonomy defines eight general areas across a spectrum with “traditional” (theatre production that does not include digital technology) at one end and a hypothetical “interactive holographic theatre” (full immersion and interaction in a virtual world) at the other. It is the seventh area, “computer-mediated performance” which bears most relevance to this research. Schrum defines computer-mediated performance as “[p]erformance [that] happens through the computer screen” and subdivides it into a further two categories: “RL- adapted performance” and “cyberspace performance”. The first he defines as “Plays about Real-Life (RL) performed in cyberspace” while the second is “Plays created and set in cyberspace; performed in cyberspace” and for both he gives examples of works that use the internet. (& there's some more discussion about how cyberformance might fit into such a taxonomy, or not). unfortunately the link i had then (10 years ago) doesn't work now. but you could probably get it from steve himself if you think it would be useful. h : ) On 16.09.2017 14:39, Michael Szpakowski wrote: > Nothing to contribute, sadly, but very keen to see anything that comes > out of this - do share! > cheers > michael > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Roger Mills <ro...@eartrumpet.org> > *To:* NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity > <netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org> > *Sent:* Saturday, September 16, 2017 6:38 AM > *Subject:* [NetBehaviour] taxonomy or framework's of telematic music > making > > Hi all, > > (sorry for cross postings) > > I’m currently writing about theories and taxonomies of telematic > music, networked music performance, tele-improvisation and other > tele-collaborative forms of music making. > > While many net musicians have contributed new theoretical perspectives > in papers and articles about individual project’s or ideas, it seems > that no one has proposed an updated typology or framework since Golo > Föllmer’s Net Music (2002, 2005) and Gill Weinberg’s Interconnected > Musical Networks (2002, 2003, 2005).. > > Does anyone know of any others, particularly recently ? > > I’m after specific categorised frameworks, rather than individual > theories on one aspect. > > Hope you’re all enjoying the weekend ! > > Bests > > Roger > > -- > Roger Mills > > http://www.eartrumpet.org <http://www.eartrumpet.org/> > http://ethernetorchestra.net <http://ethernetorchestra.net/> > http://telesound.net <http://telesound.net/> > > "Knowledge is only rumour until it is in the muscle" - Asaro Mudmen, > Papua New Guinea. > > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org <mailto:NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org> > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour > > > > > _______________________________________________ > NetBehaviour mailing list > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour -- helen varley jamieson he...@creative-catalyst.com <mailto:he...@creative-catalyst.com> http://www.creative-catalyst.com http://www.upstage.org.nz
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
