I can't believe it's still not resolved even after releasing pkgsrc 2013Q1.
I've been migrating from Debian to NetBSD on all of my servers (ISP for
~~2000 subscribers) just to help the project with PRs but I don't see the
point anymore.


On 6 January 2013 18:12, Bartek Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote:

> I also noticed that snmp doesn't report Cache Memory. All my Linux boxes
> monitored by cacti using "Memory usage" graph (standard cacti graph) show
>  Memory Free, Memory Buffers and Cache Memory. On NetBSD Cache memory is
> "-nan". I'll check which OIDs it is querying.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> On 6 January 2013 00:08, Bartek Krawczyk <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> It seems it helped. Unfortunately I noticed that the patch is missing in
>> pkgsrc 2012Q4 also. Too bad...
>> Net-snmp also has an issue with not reporting cpu usage correctly when
>> using 2 cpus. It reports usage only for the first core. I had sent a PR
>> about this one didn't have any reply yet.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> On 4 January 2013 20:38, Jean-Yves Moulin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 4 Jan 2013, at 19:34 , Bartek Krawczyk <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Which version of net-snmp do you use? I'm using the one from pkgsrc
>>> 2012Q3 (net-snmp-5.6.1.1) and my memory_netbsd.c file is a bit different I
>>> think. There is no bufspace variable in it. The bufspace variable is
>>> present in memory_freebsd.c
>>>
>>> Same version (5.6.1.1) but I applied the pkgsrc patches before edit. The
>>> bufspace variable is added by patch-ah (so, you can also change the
>>> patch-ah before running it).
>>>
>>>
>>> best,
>>> jym
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bartek Krawczyk
>> network and system administrator
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bartek Krawczyk
> network and system administrator
>



-- 
Bartek Krawczyk
network and system administrator

Reply via email to