On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 03:15:21AM +0200, Jose Luis Rodriguez Garcia wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Manuel Bouyer > <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> wrote: > > It does with LACP, I don't know if the link status is considered when > > in round-robin mode. > > > > Anyway if I had to setup something like that I'd use bridge with > > spanning-tree to select the best path. This way you get failover for > > more cases than just the local link failure. > > With Spanning-tree method, in my company network people use enhaced > SPT protocols (mainly Cisco SPT protocols that converge more faster, > etc.--), and I think that hey won't be compatible (they have denied in > the past to connect not Cisco switches to switching infraestructure > because of this). > > ¿Is there some performance degradation using this bridge configuration > over the case of no bridge setup?
Maybe a bit (I've not done precise measurements), but no more than with agr(4). -- Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org> NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference --