Before I hunt to far, anyone see why line 1 is OK, but line 2 is BAD?
# cat /etc/ipnat.conf
rdr xennet0 0/0 port 80 -> 127.0.0.1 port 3200 tcp
rdr xennet0 ::0/0 port 80 -> ::1 port 3200 tcp
# ipnat -f /etc/ipnat.conf
syntax error error at ":", line 2
Yet according to ipnat(5)
For shorthand notations such as "0/32", the equivalent for IPv6 is
"0/128". IPFilter will treat any netmask greater than 32 as an implicit
direction that the address should be IPv6, not IPv4. To be unambiguous
with 0/0, for IPv6 use ::0/0.
The rule might be wrong, but the syntax ought to be right? (That is a
naive "translation" of a working IPv4 rule - more to it than that?)
Cheers,
Patrick
