On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 08:06:35PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 12:06:54AM +0900, Miwa Susumu wrote:
> > 2016-02-07 1:15 GMT+09:00 Christos Zoulas <chris...@astron.com>:
> > >>>>pflogd process consume CPU.
> > >>>>Because of that in load average is too high.
> > >>> Can you ktrace it?
> > >>this is kdump output.
> > >>sakura# kdump ktrace.out
> > >> 974 1 pflogd EMUL "netbsd"
> > >> 974 1 pflogd CALL read(3,0xbb912000,0x80000)
> > >> 974 1 pflogd RET read -1 errno 35 Resource temporarily
> > >> unavailable
> > > And what does 'fstat -p 974' say about fd 3?
> >
> > fd 3 is bpf.
>
> I've seen something similar with arpwatch (might have been against bpf too),
> and with nagios reading a pipe (see my post today on current-users@
> about this).
I guess this is a 32bit host (i386 maybe) ?
--
Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
