You have to select "Advanced" and then "Adapter type" - paravirtualized, if
you want to try vioif0.  [image: VirtualBox_2017-07-01_20-33-55.png]

On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 at 19:10 Gua Chung Lim <ptkris...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you very much for you responding my questions.
>
> * Robert Elz (k...@munnari.oz.au) wrote:
> > To expand on what maya@ said earlier...
> >
> >   | But I can use wm0 pretty fine both IPv4 and IPv6.
> >   | I'm curious to know what this error means and how to fix it.
> >
> > Aside from turning off wpa_supplicant, as in:
> >
> >   | wpa_supplicant=YES
> >
> >       wpa_supplicant=NO
> Yes, I have tried that it has no effects. IPv6 is still OK.
> I even tried correct ssid but invalid psk, there is no effect.
>
> > instead, there is nothing to fix.
> >
> > VirtualBox doesn't emulate any wireless networks, your NetBSD has no
> > wireless interface configured, as maya said, wm0 is a wired interface
> > (in this case, an emulated wired interface).
> Yes it must be emulated bridge from host OS.
> I tried connecting mac host to "IPv4 only network".
> With the same configuration on NetBSD i.e. bridge network and IPv6 enabled.
> NetBSD guest loses IPv6 connection.
> Obviously, the bridge is emulated.
>
> > So there is nothing (real) to fix, nothing to do, it should all just
> work.
> >
> > And if for some reason it doesn't, you can always use a virtualbox NAT
> > configured network instead (though I have no idea how that would work
> > for IPv6.)
> NAT doesn't work, host is on IPv6 but guest did have only IPv4.
>
> > I left that suggestion out as there have been some occasional problems
> > with that driver, and I am not sure if they are all fixed yet (the
> problems
> > occur rarely)    But that is what I use too.
> I think, it's not yet fixed.
>
> * Chavdar Ivanov (ci4...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > I could add that you could modify the type of the emulated interface in
> > Virtual Box settings and use the paravirtualized interface virtio, which
> > will be seen in your NetBSD VM as virtio0. This allegedly should work
> > faster, although I haven't gone through any benchmarks, but my VMs with
> > this setup seem to be working fine.
> There is no paravirtualized interface. My VirtualBox only has network
> options
> as listed...
>
> Not attached
> NAT
> NAT Network
> Bridge Adapter
> Internel Network
> Host-only Adapter
> Generic Driver
>
> Note! My VirtualBox is the lastest version, 5.1.22 r115126.
>
> > I have only one problem presently with such a setup - when I use a
> bridged
> > through wireless interface NetBSD VM and I connect it to a  physical
> NetBSD
> > machine attached to the same wireless network, I lose the connectivity
> > between the NetBSD physical machine and the (Windows 10 in my case)
> Virtual
> > Box host. I just have to ssh through another NetBSD machine connected to
> > the wired interface of the same WiFi spot and from there to the other
> > NetBSD machine and clear the arp cache.
> Your host is Windows 10, not Mac. NetBSD probably supports your laptop's
> NIC.
> But on a Macbook, it doesn't support.
>
> Thank you again for spending your valued time to my questions.
>
> --
> Gua Chung Lim
>
> If you desire knowledges, learn one thing everyday.
> If you desire wisdom, leave one thing everyday.
>
> -- Lao Tzu
>

Reply via email to