> This is not how NetBSD normally does things. You could get away with > it by mounting wd0c as / later, but everything else (starting with > boot blocks) will be seriously confused and probably unable to find your > root partition.
Makes sense. This points back to the question if phase 1 boostrap (bootxx) actually needs a disklabel (sector 1 of the partition) to finds its babies. > Why are you doing things in such a strange way? Because I though I can^^ For fun, for learning, and eventually for production although I do not know how EXT2 would badly scale compared to FFSv2.
