> Just in case there was something botched in my local builds, I updated > the sparc system from the latest nightly builds of netbsd-7 and netbsd-8. > > The behavior is the same. Both netbsd-[78]/sparc produce a bad DNSSEC DS > hash (the first line): > > . IN DS 20326 8 1 42CAD163F25D96B28A8413628A2EBEBC8341B1CD > . IN DS 20326 8 2 > E06D44B80B8F1D39A95C0B0D7C65D08458E880409BBC683457104237C7F8EC8D
I see the same on one of my 8.1/sparc64 hosts. However, "openssl dgst -sha1" returns sane (identical to amd64) results on this system, so I wonder where the root of that problem actually lies, since as far as I know, the digest computing the first DS record above is sha-1. Regards, - HÃ¥vard