>It does hurt; it's an incorrect warning about something that isn't a bad >thing to do, and it causes people to think they shoudl do something else >an search for what to do.
That's exactly what I ment. Personally, I know that's no issue and everything works but, a new user might just go somewhere else when confronted by these. >Actually I think our amd64 packages are built on 9_STABLE and labeled >9.0 so the kernel has a threading fix necessary for >rust to run properly; see lang/rust for pointers if interesteed. Don't know what others do but, the packages I merge are for sure built on 9.0_STABLE. Or, rather were, now they are built on 9.1_STABLE. >Someone will need to make a patch for pkg_add and friends. Hmm... don't know if I dare but, if I find sometime I might look at it. Thanks for the hints. Den mån 26 okt. 2020 kl 18:59 skrev Greg Troxel <g...@lexort.com>: > > Pedro Pinho <pmppi...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Yes, I know but, they shouldn't be there. > > Someone will need to make a patch for pkg_add and friends. > > Basically there is more or less consensus that on NetBSD this should > only match on major version. Other OSes may have different rules. > > I don't think there is any objection or other barrier other than > ENOPATCH. >
