On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:14:29AM +0100, Bodie wrote: > And did you notice during those years how browsers requirements raised > regarding HW and got thin regarding range of supported OSs?
pkgsrc maintains older versions say firefox52 which helps. raspbian has a custom build of FF which is lightweight - what exactly they do, I do not know, but it works pretty well. > So you have fallback, even more reasons to not report as critical. One > package issues is very different from eg. port not booting at all Fair enough. Whoever has the access, please feel free to revise. My perspective is this: It's happening on a formally released image and is something that was supposed to have been fixed. Is potentially a wrong image lurking around (note wrong armv7.img i.e. _potentially_, and I hope it's untrue, hence I adjudged it so.) Just 1 correction to my mail, though it doesn't matter to the problem description. I reported the device as RPI2, but it's RPI3B (I actually have 1 each, and am migrating both from raspbian to 9.1 simultaneously, 3B as a desktop and 2 for some other use. Hence I might have erred when reporting.) -- Mayuresh
