On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 08:19:53PM +0100, David Brownlee wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 23:05, Mark Davies <m...@ecs.vuw.ac.nz> wrote: > > > > > > On 2/06/21 8:32 am, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: > > > I force-downgraded samba 4.14.4 to 4.13.9 (itself released recently, > > > 11th of May). It works as expected. > > > The cvs diff with respect to the current pkgsrc version is attached, > > > in case someone else hits the same problem. Surely the other packages > > > using samba should be also rebuilt - and database/ldb uninstalled, as > > > it conflicts with samba 4.13.9. > > > > > > I basically just changed the package version in the Makefile, removing > > > references to database/ldb; edited the distinfo file and ran 'make > > > distinfo'. The PLIST was also manually adjusted. > > > > Yeah, locally I reverted to 4.13.7 which was the last 4.13 version in > > pkgsrc. Just added an additional patch to make it happy to use the > > latest ldb, but if we are actually reverting samba in pkgsrc we should > > probably revert ldb as well. > > Maybe add 4.13.7 plus your patch to pkgsrc-wip, so anyone using samba4 > from pkgsrc current on netbsd-9 has an easy way to get a working > system pending the kernel pullup? > > David
This really isn't good enough, we're about to do a stable release of pkgsrc with broken samba. Samba should be fixed before we cut the release, we can't tell people not to use binary packages because they're broken.
