m...@petermann-it.de (Matthias Petermann) writes: >On 14.07.21 14:10, Greg Troxel wrote: >> I think you may have uncovered a bug in zfs statistics. >>> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM >>> tank ONLINE 0 0 0 >>> raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 >>> dk0 ONLINE 0 0 0 >>> dk1 ONLINE 0 0 0 >>> dk2 ONLINE 0 0 0 >>> dk3 ONLINE 0 0 0
>most exciting question at the moment. If it is the case that ZFS has=20 >corrected the error - then it would be really great if it also displays=20 >this somewhere. Looking at the code, ZFS doesn't count errors when - the I/O was done speculatively (read-ahead ?) - it's an EIO error but not a retry yet (only final errors are counted) - it's a write to the intent log (there are probably separate counters)
