On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 09:54:32AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote: > > That's a matter of opinion. Traditional practice was to separate it, > to protect / from filling up, and to keep fs churn on / down for greater > likelihood of things being ok. >
Well, yes, definitely a matter of opinion but the history was rooted in the fact that disks were not that large back in the day so you had multiple drives to cope and there were no journalling file systems so a crash could be dire. These days, disks are relatively capacious and we have journalling on file systems readily available which means the fsck time is not an issue. So, there are fewer reasons to separate out the partitions, especially on a personal machine. Sure, there are some instances where separating /var and /var/tmp and even /var/mail are a good thing but it really isn't a must do. > correct size for /var depends on what you put in it! Yes, that is the problem and it is really painful when you undershoot or even overshoot on other partitions and find you really need that space elsewhere. -- Brett Lymn -- Sent from my NetBSD device. "We are were wolves", "You mean werewolves?", "No we were wolves, now we are something else entirely", "Oh"
