Brad Spencer <[email protected]> wrote: > Jan Schaumann <[email protected]> writes:
> > Our ls(1) still supports (via strmode(3)) and > > documents files of types > > > > #define _S_ARCH1 0200000 /* Archive state 1, ls -l shows 'a' > > */ > > #define _S_ARCH2 0400000 /* Archive state 2, ls -l shows 'A' > > */ > There is the concept of archive with the flags that a FFS file can have. > See 'man chflags' for details. However, I am not sure that this use of > archive is what you have found. Yeah, file _flags_ are different from the file _type_. What I'm wondering is whether supporting this file type is in fact something that's (still) useful. The "archive bit"[1] sounds like something that might be referred to here? -Jan [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive_bit
