Ellie <[email protected]> writes: > But isn't the ZFS upstream now heavily written with LLMs these days? I > know NetBSD doesn't use the latest code but I assume some day it will, > and that direction worries me.
That is a fair concern. > I wonder if there have ever been any considerations to add a content > checksum capability (as an option, not as a requirement) to FFS, for > example? I have not heard people suggesting that. It just wasn't part of the FFS design. Forking ZFS before it went to the dark side seems like a better plan; I think ZFS really is a good design.[ >> [...] Even if it is still a manual install, if you're comfortable, >> can be done once and not be a huge big deal. > > I hope to find the most not-manual install assistant I can, simply > because I like to reinstall my systems for various reasons. > > So if the setup is quite advanced to recreate, that can come back to > bite me in the future if that makes sense. It makes sense. I keep notes of what I did when initalizing disks so I can use them for reference later.
